Before, Now and In Between
There is a fantasy as old as the modern gay rights
movement, that if all our skins turned lavender overnight the majority,
confounded by our numbers and our diversity and recognising a few of our
faces, would at once let go of prejudice for evermore.
In the United Kingdom today, the reality is that closet
doors are opening, gingerly or defiantly, all over the place but not yet at
such an enthusiastic rate that the imminent fulfillment of gay rights is
inevitable. The powers that be are not yet convinced that we are a force to
be reckoned with.
Meanwhile, some of us lobby and some try to frighten
the horses and together we make steady but minimal progress toward equality
under the law. The recent wholesale repeal of leftover English anti-gay
statutes by the Irish Parliament is an inspiration. This seems to have been
achieved without the benefit of a popular national campaign. That's not
surprising, when anyone openly objecting to the old laws on his own behalf
would have been declaring himself a criminal.

On the other hand we can also be inspired by the tactics
of activists in the USA, who are funded by very large numbers of supporters.
Together they have forced Congress, the Presidency and the media to debate
and re-stress the basis of their constitution: all men are created
equal. There is an abundance of gay rights organisations, recruiting in
every state. When these groups work together, as they did for the 1993 march
on Washington, they produce a miracle akin to skins turning lavender.
The media coverage was ubiquitous. The Washington story,
for those marching as well as for those watching on cable television, was of
a mighty coalition from every area of gay life, united in their demand for
justice. Leading the parade was a collection of good and famous people none
of them more dominant than any of the million who walked behind. This
popular movement didn't need a lone leader. Heaven preserve us from a
Fuhrer, a pope or even a martyred King.
Rainbow-striped balloons, streamers, flags, ribbons and
sashes decorated the route. Men and women were half-naked. It was too hot
for too many costumes. Judging from the hugely supportive bystanders, only a
handful of crackpots objected that we had completely taken over the nation's
capital, so that wherever you went, the straights were bent for a day. From
the rally stage, with the Capitol's dome for a backcloth, the rhetoric
flowed through the loudspeakers along the Mall to the George Washington
monument. Old campaigners like Larry Kramer and new ones like Maitina
Navrátilová. There were professional politicians - Jesse Jackson, the two
out-gay congressmen - and a recorded message from Senator Kennedy,
weekending with his new bride up north. But in the nation of big
showbusiness, where were the big performers?
It's a sad fact that there isn't yet one leading American
actor of either sex who is out. Movie agents and Hollywood executives are
falling out or being pushed out of their closets. They ostentatiously fund
pro-gay enterprises. But the stars themselves just won't twinkle.
Over the years there has been a long list of emigré gay
Brits who have acted in Los Angeles. To a man and to a woman they too have
nestled down in the cosy closet of the Califomian sunshine, unshamed by
their proximity to Christopher Isherwood and David Hockney. Only
posthumously has Cary Grant (from Bristol) been identified and, with less
confidence, Laurence Olivier in the latest biography. (Joan Plowright says
that her husband was latterly boastful about his sexual adventures and would
surely have included the spice of Danny Kaye, had there actually been an
affair. Anyway she says, "we must get love wherever we can'.)
There is a middle-aged British actress who used to
introduce herself at London benefits by name, adding, 'and I'm a dyke'. Now
that she is in the movies, she isn't out any longer and, with no joy, has
wittingly entered the Hollywood closet, policed by the commercial need that
we should all be the same, so that we shall all buy the same.
She's like another British colleague who during rehearsal
for a Broadway show confided that he wasn't gay in New York. That was twelve
years ago. When Sean Mathias and I went to the end-of-season Tony awards ŕ
deux, we were clandestinely congratulated for our daring in being out
together. "Well, if you share a home and a bed, you might as well share a couple of complimentary tickets. Today, America is awash
with openly gay playwrights. Their example and the bravery of people with
HIV/AIDS are beginning to transform the very close society of New York
theatre and a few eminent young stage actors have also come out. That is
possible because Broadway and off-Broadway are a community. By contrast,
Hollywood and its suburbs are a commercial conglomerate.

I am proud to belong to a growing group of openly gay
theatre people in the UK. Some of the most productive theatre enterprises
are artistically run by them: Greenwich, the Lyric Hammersmith, the Royal
Court, Stratford East, Cheek-by-Jowl, DV8, Gay Sweatshop and the managements
of Michael Codron and Cameron Mackintosh. There are actors, too, across the
generations from Simon Russell-Beale and Anthony Sher to Alec McCowen and
Nigel Hawthorne. Yet, even at a time of lesbian chic, there isn't a leading
lesbian theatre actress of any age who is out in the UK. Should we expect
otherwise? 'It's hard enough surviving as a woman in British theatre. Don't
ask me to be a dyke as well!' This from a renowned actress who is out to her
family, friends and working colleagues. So she tries to protect her job
prospects with a lie.
Famous actors have long promoted non-theatre causes.
Edward Alleyn spent a fortune 500 years ago on education. Fanny Kemble
campaigned against slavery. The Redgraves publicised the PLO. Anthony
Hopkins has acknowledged his debt to Alcoholics Anonymous. Brian Rix
abandoned farce to run MENCAP and has now joined Attenborough in the House
of Lords. In the Commons, Gyles Brandreth and Glenda Jackson have followed
Andrew Fauids into the fray. Tenniel Evans is an actor-priest. With the same
combination of private impulses and public service, some actors now work for
gay rights. But we are outnumbered by others who, not hesitating to do an
AIDS benefit or be photographed signing a poll tax petition, yet continue to
disguise their sexuality even in their autobiographies. What a joy not to be
part of that any longer.

At the outset of their careers, there are two obvious
types of theatre actor: the super-confident seeking an extra outlet for
their exhibitionism and the under-confident like me. I was attracted to the
security of daily rehearsals, so that for three hours each evening on stage
the confusion of everyday life was kept at bay. Looking back, my own
confusion lay in society's disapproval of me. When I became an actor in
1961, it was illegal for me to make love. Ever since I had fallen for Ivor
Novello when I was nine, I had wanted to work in the theatre, where I
expected to meet other queers. I did.
Working in regional theatre in the 1960s, I missed
swinging London and never discovered gay bars. When the law was somewhat
relaxed in 1967, I noted that my rôle models, freed from the threat of
blackmail, still didn't declare themselves. I half-believed that Gertrude
Lawrence really was Noel Coward's greatest love. Later, I didn't realise
that Gay Liberation was fighting for my freedom. My closet was comfortable,
protected by the family structure of theatre companies, in which each
person's individuality was celebrated. If Betty Bourne or Martin Sherman
ever suggested that I come out like them when I worked with them, I was too
engrossed in my career to hear them.
I believed the nonsensical convention that audiences
wouldn't accept a young actor in a straight romantic part if they knew he
was gay. Does that mean that a law-abiding actor can't play a convincing
murderer? Michael Winner considered me for a film in 1966 and asked if I was
gay. I prevaricated long enough for him to say that 'queers often make the
best screen lovers'. Twelve years on, Sam Spiegel offered me the lead in a
Pinter screenplay but hastily withdrew it when I mentioned my boyfriend.
Meanwhile, in the theatre, I had played three wonderful
gay roles: Marlowe's Edward II, Shaffer's
farcical queen in Black Comedy and
Max in Sherman's Bent. The dimmest
theatregoer could have drawn the correct conclusion. At the time, I agreed
with John Schlesinger, who used to think there was no need for him to come
out, as his work made it obvious that he was gay. Conversely, when Simon
Callow discussed his homosexuality in press interviews, the journalists
declined to report it. He eventually managed to get himself out, by writing
his own book!
The straight media has long wavered between thinking of
homosexuality as a libel or a chastisement. That didn't, every so often,
prevent their dropping hints about me. The Daily Express used to misplace
the apostrophe by calling me "The Queens' favourite actor'. The Sunday
Telegraph posted me on a list of 'unobtainable
bachelors' alongside David Hockney and Rudolf Nureyev. The Guardian
mentioned that I shared my home with another man. I was spared the indignity
of a tabloid expose because I wasn't newsworthy. No journalist ever asked me
whether I was gay, not even Nicholas de Jongh. If he had, I might have asked
him the same.

I finally came out of my own accord in 1988.1 had spent
the previous year working all over the USA. My last stop was California. In
San Francisco, three men helped me decide to come out. Steve Beery had been
Harvey Milk's lover at the time of his assassination. Like Steve, Terry
Anderson was a determined gay activist and helped organise the annual Pride
parade out of the Castro district. His partner, Armistead Maupin, was still
writing his Tales of the City sextet. All three lives concentrated on
gay politics and their example to me was clear: until you're out you don't
know what you are missing. So it proved for me and, as far as I can see, for
everyone else who ever came out. My three godfathers in San Francisco also
stressed the absence of any out American actors but we realised that at 49,1
was well enough established to resist any backlash of disapproval from
employers, critics or fans. So it proved.
What I hadn't anticipated was the support system in
waiting, as for converts backstage at a revivalist mission. I've made new
friends galore who work among the 500 specifically lesbian and gay groups in
the UK. Of late, gay-oriented commerce is thriving against the tide of
recession. In Soho, there are the sproutings of the first exclusively gay
area in central London. There does, after all, seem to be a powerfully pink
pound. I help to spend it on gay literature, on as much gay theatre as
possible and in my gay local pub.
That is now. I didn't do these things before. Before and
now and, in between, saying 'As a gay man' was much less daunting than
having to tell Gladys, my Quaker stepmother for forty years. That involved a
trip to her home in the Lake District. We drove out into the friendly hills,
the most beautiful in the world. I began with a warning that I had something
important to tell her. She ended it by saying, 'I thought it was going to be
something dreadful. I've always known you were gay.' 'Poor Gladys,' said an
ancient friend of hers, 'now she'll have to leave the village.' Of course
she didn't. Anyway the Society of Friends has an impeccable record on gay
issues. My relationship with Gladys has never been so loving.
Friendships and working for equality through Stonewall
have filled an emotional vacuum of which I hadn't been aware. If I'm also a
better actor because of that, I shouldn't be surprised.


|
|